Relations
Between Turkey and the European Union The last tango
Turkey is the only pluralist
secular democracy in the Muslim world and has always attached great
importance to developing its relations with other European countries.
Historically, Turkish culture has had a profound impact over most of
Eastern and Southern Europe. Turkey began "westernising" its economic,
political and social structures in the 19th century. Following the
First World War and the proclamation of the Republic in 1923, it chose
Western Europe as the model for its new secular structure. Turkey
has ever since closely aligned itself with the West and has become a
founding member of the United Nations, a member of NATO, the Council of
Europe, OECD and an associate member of the Western European Union.
During the Cold War, Turkey was part of the Western alliance, defending
freedom, democracy and human rights. In this respect, Turkey has played
and continues to play a vital role in the defence of the European
continent and the principal elements of its foreign policy have
converged with those of its European partners. Having
entered into very close cooperation with Western Europe in the
political field, it was therefore only natural for Turkey to complete
this in the economic area. Thus, Turkey chose to begin close
cooperation with the fledging EEC in 1959. The Ankara Agreement
In July 1959, shortly after the creation of the European Economic
Community in 1958, Turkey made its first application to join. The EEC's
respon-se to Turkey's application in 1959 was to suggest the
establishment of an association until Turkey's situation permitted its
accession. The ensuing negotiations resulted in the signature of the
Agreement Creating An Association Between The Republic of Turkey and
the European Economic Community (the "Ankara Agreement") on 12
September 1963. This agreement, which entered into force on 1 December
1964, aimed at securing Turkey's full membership in the EEC through the
establishment in three phases of a customs union which would serve as
an instrument to bring about integration between the EEC and
Turkey. The Customs Union that was to be established between the
parties went much further than the abolition of tariff and quantitative
barriers to trade between the parties and the application of a Common
External Tariff to imports from third countries, and envisaged
harmonisation with EEC policies in virtually every field relating to
the internal market. The Ankara Agreement still constitutes today
the legal basis of the Association between Turkey and the EU. Turkey's
application for full membership
in 1987 Turkey applied for full membership in 1987,
on the basis of the EEC Treaty's article 237 which gave any European
country the right to do so. Turkey's request for accession, filed not
under the relevant provisions of the Ankara Agreement, but those of the
Treaty of Rome, underwent the normal procedures. The Council forwarded
Turkey's application to the Commission for the preparation of an
Opinion. This has reconfirmed Turkey's eligibility, given that a
similar application by Morocco was turned down by the Council on the
grounds that Morocco is not a European country. The Commission's
Opinion was completed on 18 December 1989 and endorsed by the Council
on 5 February 1990. It basically underlined Turkey's eligibility for
membership, yet deferred the indepth analysis of Turkey's application
until the emergence of a more favourable
environment.
Although it did not attain its basic objective, Turkey's application
revived Turkey-EC relations: efforts to develop relations intensified
on both sides, the Association's political and technical mechanisms
started meeting again and measures to complete the Customs Union in
time were resumed. Meanwhile, the Commission's promised cooperation
package, known as the "Matutes Package", was unveiled in 1990, but
could not be adopted by the Council due to Greece's objection. The
European Union's Enlargement Process and Turkey
Turkey attached particular importance to the
EU's current enlargement process for two main reasons. Firstly, having
played an active role during the Cold War, it was only natural for
Turkey to aspire for inclusion in the new European architecture which
it helped to build. Second, the Association between Turkey and the EU
aims at Turkey's full membership in the EU, as underlined once again
with the Customs Union whose dynamics aim at bringing about further
integration between the two parties. This is why Turkey kept the
question of inclusion in the EU's enlargement process on the agenda of
Turkey-EU relations. At the Association Council of 29 April 1997, the
EU reconfirmed Turkey's eligibility for membership and asked the
Commission to prepare recommendations to deepen Turkey-EU relations,
while claiming that the development of this relationship depended on a
number of factors rela-ting to Greece, Cyprus and human
rights. The Commission, however, excluded
Turkey from the enlargement process in its report entitled "Agenda
2000" which it disclosed on 16 July 1997. While the report conceded
that the Customs Union was functioning satisfactorily and that it had
demonstrated Turkey's ability to adapt to the EU norms in many areas,
it repeated the same political and economic arguments against Turkey
and made no reference to Turkey's full membership objective. The
Commission unveiled on the same day as "Agenda 2000", the
"Communication" to enhance relations with Turkey, where it reconfirmed
Turkey's eligibility and brought a number of recommendations ranging
from liberalisation of trade in services to consumer protection, that
aim at taking Turkey-EU relations beyond the Customs Union, but cited a
number of political issues as pre-conditions for moving our relations
forward. The fact that the EU confirmed
Turkey's eligibility for membership but excluded it from the
enlargement process has been seen as a contradiction. The Commission
opted to propose measures that would reinforce the relationship within
their current framework and complemented these measures with the idea
of inviting Turkey to the European Conference. In the light of the EU's
claims that all candidates would be judged according to the same
objective criteria and that there would be no prejudice in their
evaluation, Turkey found the Commission's approach unjust and
discriminatory. The Luxembourg European Council and the following
period Although the decisions of the
Luxembourg Summit reflected by and large the contents of the
Commission's "Agenda 2000", the following points related to Turkey need
to be highlighted: ü Turkey's eligibility was reconfirmed ; ü The EU
decided to set up a strategy to prepare Turkey for accession and to
create a special procedure to review the developments to be made ; ü
Turkey was invited to the European Conference, but a number of
unacceptable pre-conditions were put forward ; ü The development of
Turkey-EU relations was made conditional on certain economic, political
and foreign policy questions, and,.ü The Commission was asked to submit
suitable proposals to enhance Turkey-EU relations.
In a statement issued the day after the
Summit, the Turkish Government criticised the EU's attitude, stated
that Turkey's goal of full membership and Association would
nevertheless be maintained, but that the development of bilateral
relations depended on the EU's honouring its commitments, and that it
would not discuss with the EU issues remaining outside the contractual
context of the bilateral relations as long as the EU did not change its
attitude. In line with this statement Turkey did not participate in the
inaugural meeting of the European Conference held in London on 12 March
1998. Turkey thus made it clear that the way out of this difficult
situation in the bilateral relations depended on the political will to
be displayed by the EU. The Commission published its
recommendations for a "European Strategy" on 4 March 1998. Its contents
were more or less similar to former packages which the EU promised but
failed to deliver in the past. Moreover, the ambiguity over how this
package would be financed prevented Turkey from being optimistic about
its chances of being put into effect soon. The Commission itself
conceded that the implementation of this package would require
considerable financial resources. The summit meeting
held in Cardiff on 15-16 June 1998 offered a good opportunity to
rectify the unwarranted difficult period which Turkey-EU relations
entered into following the Luxembourg Summit. Although certain positive
developments were achieved with regard to the language used for Turkey
in the Presidency Conclusions of the Summit, they were not sufficient
for Turkey to modify its policy outlined after the Luxembourg Summit.
An important result of the Cardiff Summit for Turkey-EU relations was
the EU leaders' endorsement of the Commission's "European Strategy" for
Turkey and the request made to the Commission to find solutions with a
view to making available the financial resources required for the
implementation of the "European Strategy".