Cyprus:
It all went wrong The UN Secretary General,
Kofi Annan, has presented a plan, which was supported by the EU. The UN
and the EU have declared that it should be accepted and this last
chance should be seized if a solution was to be found. Then, there were
the refe-renda. The Turkish Cypriots voted yes.
They said yes to a solution, yes to a new state, yes to peace, yes to
reunification, yes to democracy, yes to the EU…
The Greek Cypriots voted no. They said no to everything…
It had been quite a long time that the Turkish side
was accused of being aggressive and against a solution. For the first
time, the international opinion has seen the truth: the Greek Cypriots
want neither a solution nor reunification. It
was a huge disappointment and especially an important failure for the
EU and the UN… Then there was a complete
silence… The Greek Cypriots have become part
of the EU, while the Turkish Cypriots have seen themselves rejected,
isolated, humiliated, and deceived
The EU Commission has declared itself as
deceived by the Greek Cypriots and that it will make new proposals very
rapidly to help the Turkish side of the island out of isolation…The EU
has promised to keep its word and intends definitely to act against
this unfair situation… "Very rapidly?" have you
said "Definitely"? The EU is not acting
that fast. And nothing is definite either. The Greek Cypriots who are
now part of the EU and claim to represent also the Turkish Cypriots do
not seem to agree with the European Commission and Parliament when it
is about saving partially the EU from this "shame". Moreover, the
Commission proposals seem legally
problematical. The Turkish Cypriots,
disappointed, are heading towards a political crisis. Those who have
supported the Annan Plan and trusted the EU are more isola-ted than
ever. There are continuous
discussions: The Turkish Minister of Foreign
Affairs Abdullah Gül has declared that "it is time to keep the promise
to lift the injustice against the Turkish Cypriots which has been
lasting for forty years …" and added : "Turkey and the Turkish Republic
of Northern Cyprus did what was expected from them. Now, we are
expecting concrete steps" …
The current situation is disturbing immensely
the Prime Minister of the TRNC, Mehmet Ali Talat, the main supporter of
the EU and the "yes vote". He can only visit the European capitals and
try to explain that it is all going wrong, that the Greek Cypriots are
maintaining the blockade on the island and in the EU, and that an
urgent action is needed. However, this confident and busy leader can
only notice that nobody in the EU is in a hurry anymore, and in fact,
it seems that this was all planned and expected by the EU.
As for the President of the TRNC, Rauf Denktas, who
has never trusted the Annan Plan or the EU, his declarations are
cautious: In a carefully worded speech at the
Peace and Freedom Day ceremony in Lefkosa, the President said that no
people on earth will ever want to abandon its sovereignty because of
internal hinders and problems. "We intend to reach a deal with the
Greek Cypriots based on equality" he said, then addressing the youth,
the President warned them against being deceived by unfounded promises
of prosperity that are linked to the prospects of EU membership. "No
nation will ever thrive without working hard and - above all - learning
its history well" he said.
It all went wrong. However, the EU has
seemed quite optimistic and the Commission President Prodi declared to
be opposed to the issue being imported in the EU. It is now. The future
Commission will inherit this sensitive issue. Following the EU's
mistakes, some people believe that only the USA can bring a solution,
while others pretend that the only solution is the recognition of the
TRNC. What will happen now? It seems that no
one knows. What we do know is that the "politically symbolic"
proposals made by the Commission will not lead to concrete measures,
despite the 259 millions Euro intended (eventually) for the northern
part of the island. The government in Ankara,
which has gone down the path that it was "shown" despite high political
risks, is now quite preoccupied. Once again, its confidence in the EU
has not reinforced its position. As for the divided Turkish Cypriots
politicians, they are ready to settle their differences as some
mistakes have been made. The
calmest and less surprised one seems to be the "man in the street" in
Turkey as well as in Cyprus, as he knows Cyprus' history and is
learning to know better the EU, its abilities and limits.
Let us recall Cyprus' history in order to
refresh our memory: A BRIEF HISTORY Located 70
km from the Turkish coast, 100 km from Syria, 370 Km from Egypt, 400 Km
from Rhode and 800 Km from Greece, Cyprus, with a surface of 9,251 Km,
is the third largest Mediterranean island after Sicily and Sardinia.
Its geographical location, crossed by trade
roads linking Egypt to the eastern Mediterrane-an, had established the
island's great importance since history began. Cyprus became an island
after a subsidence separated it from the continental region of Hatay,
and it was first populated as early as 4000 BC. Objects found in
excavations show that the island was intensively colonized by Anatolia
from 3000 BC onwards. Cyprus, which was
the reason behind a perpetual war between the Hittites and the
Egyptians, was conquered consecutively by the Dors, the Phoenicians,
the Assyrians, the Persians and the Macedonians. Following a period
under Roman domination in 394 AD after Emperor Constantine's death, and
then the collapse of the Roman Empire, the island fell under the
authority of Byzantium, the Eastern Roman Empire.
It was then conquered in 649 by Muaviye,
Governor of Damascus, and, under Muslim rule for a while, it was
re-conquered in 964 by the Byzantine Emperor Nikeforos Fakos. The
island was successively under the domination of the English, Genoese,
Venetians and the Memlouks.
Finally, the conquest of Cyprus became a
military and political necessity for the Ottomans, who had already
established their domination of Eastern Mediterranean following the
conquest of Egypt by Sultan Selim. Cyprus was conquered on 9 September
1570 by Lala Mustafa Pacha, and would remain under Ottoman rule for the
next 300 years. Cyprus was lent to the British Empire in 1878 to limit
the concessions that the Ottomans had to make following their defeat
against Russia. Thus, while still a Ottoman property, the island was
transferred entirely to British administration.
ENOSIS Since the administration of Cyprus was
given to Britain, the main element determining the relations between
Greek and Turkish Cypriots was the Enosis, i.e. the movement towards a
union of Cyprus with Greece. Indeed, the Greek
Cypriots, who regarded British rule as an important step towards
Enosis, intensified their unionist activities, with the active support
of Greece. THE REDUCTION OF THE TURKISH POPULATION
In the meantime, the British used the motive of a
"reorganisation" to pension the civil servants of Turkish origins and
appointed Greek Cypriots to replace them. Therefore, people from the
Turkish community were put under economic strain and consequently left
the island for mainland Anatolia, which caused the demographic balance
in Cyprus to alter to the Turks' disadvantage.
During WWI, the alliance of the Ottoman Empire with Germany led Britain
to invade Cyprus unilaterally on 5 November 1914. As a result, about
8,000 Turkish families who refused to support the British annexation
migrated to Anatolia. On March 25th 1921, the
first plebiscite from the Greek Cypriots requesting the unification to
Greece and other further demands going in that direction were rejected
by the British. The Turkish Republic, which was
established at the end of a war of independence and officially
recognised by The Entente Powers in accordance with the Lausanne Treaty
signed on July 23rd 1923, also recognised Cyprus as a British
possession. The same Lausanne Treaty, allowing
a period of two years to the Turkish Cypriots to apply for and obtain
the Turkish nationality. A large number of them were discontent with
the British administration, and migrated to Turkey.
During a period from 1925 to 1959, the Greek
cypriots enhanced their actions to modify the status of the island.
Moreover, a "plebiscite", organised on 15th and 20th of December 1950
under the initiative of the Orthodox Church, reiterated their claim for
the unification of the island to Greece. Britain, which did not
recognise the legitimacy of such a plebiscite, issued a new proposal
aiming to grant more autonomy to both communities. However, this
proposal, and the 1954 proposal to give the island a constitution, were
not implemented.